[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#680545: marked as done (RM: xemacs21/21.4.22-3.2 aplus-fsf/4.22.1-4.2 xemacs21-packages/2009.02.17.dfsg.1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2012 20:57:09 +0200
with message-id <4FF73505.5050505@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680545: RM: xemacs21/21.4.22-3.2 aplus-fsf/4.22.1-4.2 xemacs21-packages/2009.02.17.dfsg.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #680545,
regarding RM: xemacs21/21.4.22-3.2 aplus-fsf/4.22.1-4.2 xemacs21-packages/2009.02.17.dfsg.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
680545: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680545
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi,

xemacs21 has two RC bugs is NMU-maintained since before Squeeze. Its
reverse-dependencies tree has two leaves: aplus-fsf (no RC bugs,
NMU-maintained since Dec 2011) and xemacs21-packages (1 RC bug).

I'd argue that removing those three packages from testing makes wheezy
free from 3 RC bugs and creates an incentive for the maintainers (or
users fwiw) of those packages to get them fixed.

Cheers,

OdyX

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=Hd6n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 06/07/2012 19:25, Didier Raboud wrote:


xemacs21 has two RC bugs is NMU-maintained since before Squeeze. Its
reverse-dependencies tree has two leaves: aplus-fsf (no RC bugs,
NMU-maintained since Dec 2011) and xemacs21-packages (1 RC bug).

I'd argue that removing those three packages from testing makes wheezy
free from 3 RC bugs and creates an incentive for the maintainers (or
users fwiw) of those packages to get them fixed.



3 RC-bugs less planned for next britney run.

Cheers.

--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: