Your message dated Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:56:06 +0200 with message-id <4FF718A6.4070102@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#680401: unblock: powerstat/0.01.17-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #680401, regarding unblock: powerstat/0.01.17-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 680401: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680401 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: powerstat/0.01.17-1
- From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@ubuntu.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:10:56 +0100
- Message-id: <20120705171056.31979.10786.reportbug@lenovo>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package powerstat I request a freeze exception for powerstat/0.01.17-1 which has been uploaded to unstable. The delta for this version includes a bug fix noted in the change log entry as follows: powerstat (0.01.17-1) unstable; urgency=low * Update version * Add support for /sys/class/power_supply (Closes: #679593) The added support for /sys/class/power_supply fix is absolutely required to make powerstat work at all with newer linux kernels which do not have the older (deprecated) /proc/acpi/battery interface. Without this fix powerstat just won't work in Wheezy. Thanks! unblock powerstat/0.01.17-1
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>, 680401-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#680401: unblock: powerstat/0.01.17-1
- From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:56:06 +0200
- Message-id: <4FF718A6.4070102@dogguy.org>
- In-reply-to: <4FF7018B.8010000@canonical.com>
- References: <20120705171056.31979.10786.reportbug@lenovo> <4FF6D93C.5000409@dogguy.org> <4FF7018B.8010000@canonical.com>
On 06/07/12 17:17, Colin Ian King wrote:On 06/07/12 13:25, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:On 05/07/12 19:10, Colin Ian King wrote:The added support for /sys/class/power_supply fix is absolutely required to make powerstat work at all with newer linux kernels which do not have the older (deprecated) /proc/acpi/battery interface. Without this fix powerstat just won't work in Wheezy.How this package got tested before the initial upload? There are only a few days delay between the _two_ uploads.Forgot to Cc: the bug in my earlier replies to Mehdi. So, originally, we extensively tested this on Ubuntu on 3.2 and 3.4 kernels, however, we had omitted to test with /proc/acpi/battery disabled which was bad oversight on my behalf. Subsequently for the 0.1.17-1 changes I've tested this on Wheezy + unstable updates + also with Ubuntu with 3.4 and 3.5 kernels on a range of 4 laptops which handle the battery status differently - a Dell, Lenovos and a HPMini.Thanks for the reply! AFAIK, CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER has been disabled (in Debian) in linux/2.6.29-1. So this is _very_ old. (Not even in Squeeze). Given that the package just came out of NEW and it didn't have much testing by our users up to now, I think I'm not going to grant the freeze exception I'm afraid. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---