Bug#679778: unblock: spandsp/0.0.6~pre20-2
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 08:12:01AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 02.07.2012 07:22, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 16:48 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>>> > Please unblock package spandsp
> [...]
>>> On that basis, the changes from both -1 and -2 are relevant to the
>>> unblock. While the changes between the current testing package and
>>> -1
>>> aren't huge, the changelog isn't really very helpful in terms of
>>> helping
>>> me decide whether they're appropriate for an unblock as it just says
>>> "new upstream version".
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to expand (briefly should be fine) on what the
>>> changes in the new upstream version are?
>>
>> As of now there are two separate issues:
>
> Apologies if my question wasn't clear. I was asking for more detail on
> why 0.0.6~pre20 is a better candidate for release than the version
> that's currently in wheezy, other than by sheer virtue of being "newer".
There's no real changelog. However the difference between pre18 and
pre20 is not big.
pre19: https://gitorious.org/spandsp/spandsp/commit/926c6eec0a2955dffccea3992232d0a064f4a5f6
A bugfix commit. IIRC the fix in t4_rx.c was discovered by faxes that
managed to crash Asterisk.
pre20: https://gitorious.org/spandsp/spandsp/commit/83f249c1a0172d3246a2ffb69fb534f725bdbca3
Again: bugfixes. Sadly I'm not sure what for, exactly (that git tree is
something I produce from tarballs and I have no better changelos,
sadly).
--
Tzafrir Cohen | tzafrir@jabber.org | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's
tzafrir@cohens.org.il | | best
tzafrir@debian.org | | friend
Reply to: