Bug#672142: transition: allegro4.4
Am 16.06.2012 14:16, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 14:11:34 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>
>> Am 16.06.2012 13:49, schrieb Julien Cristau:
>>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:28:25 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>>>
>>>> allegro4.4 is now a migration candidate and I didn't get access
>>>> to a porterbox yet. Can we continue the transition?
>>>>
>>> I don't think so. Either that FTBFS gets fixed, or the transition
>>> gets reverted, AFAICT.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Julien
>>
>> Even if allegro4.2 has the same bug? The last time it was built on
>> ia64 was a year ago with gcc 4.4.5 and since the changes between
>> allegro4.2 and allegro4.4 are not that big, chances are that
>> allegro4.2 doesn't built there anymore either.
>>
> hmm, no, in that case if the bug can't get fixed we'd have to remove all
> allegro reverse dependencies on ia64.
How do we find out? Would you issue a rebuild of allegro4.2 on ia64?
Reply to: