Re: Handling of changelogs and bin-nmus
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As such, I suggest that we handle "binary rebuild" differently:
> - debian/changelog is left unmodified since it's the source changelog
> => it defines the ${source:Version} substvar
> - debian/changelog.binary-rebuild (or any other better name) is created
> when we want to do a bin-nmu
> => it defines the ${binary:Version} and it's not included in
> the generated source package
Sounds good to me. Where would the binary changelog entry and binary
version be stored in the resulting binary package?
Reply to: