On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 08:43:54 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote: > > Johannes Ring <johannr@simula.no> (31/05/2012): > >> python-ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (2.0.7). Please > >> binNMU it. > >> > >> nmu python-ufc_2.0.5-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against swig 2.0.7, see #675207.' > > > > if this package has such strict dependencies on swig, why aren't they > > exposed through strict package dependencies? > > You mean by adding something like "swig2.0 (>= 2.0.7)" in > Build-Depends? The thing is that UFC only depends on SWIG >= 2.0.0, > however, it will always need to be rebuilt whenever a new SWIG release > enters the archive. Can this be automated or will I need to request a > binNMU each time? > That sounds broken. Why is that necessary? Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature