tag 675890 pending thanks Hi, Vincent Danjean <vdanjean@debian.org> (04/06/2012): > Note that all reverse-dependencies are package built from owfs itself > (same source package) so the upload of this new upstream version > should not change anything for the rest of the Debian archive. thanks for checking with us. Please go ahead with your upload. > (and do I need to fill such a bug when all reverse dependencies are in > the same source package?) As long as your package doesn't get caught in another “real” transition, that's fine. If it does, that might delay other transitions, which isn't a good idea when we're trying to get them all done. In other words, it's appreciated, though not mandatory. Your transition might happen a little quicker this way since we usually keep a close eye on the excuses page, and since we usually request packages to be decrufted a bit before the ftpmasters' semi-removal happens. (So your package isn't blocked from migrating due to the out-of-date binaries.) Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature