Re: ia64 qualification for Wheezy
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:18:18PM +0200, MG wrote:
>On 28-5-2012 14:20, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 01:05:58PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>>On 23.05.2012 19:31, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>>>On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 13:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>>>>With the sound of the ever approaching freeze ringing loudly in our
>>>>>ears, we're (somewhat belatedly) looking at finalising the list of
>>>>>release architectures for the Wheezy release.
>>>>>
>>>>>Comments on / additions and corrections to the content of
>>>>>http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.html would be
>>>>>appreciated, as would any other information you think is relevant to
>>>>>helping us determine ia64's status for the release.
>>>>
>>>>Any comments... ?
>>>
>>>One thing that was bought to my attention in private mail is #638068
>>>in initramfs-tools.
>>
>>I'm happy to test a possible fix for #638068 on my ia64 machines.
>
>Me too! I haven't been trying anything with Linux IA-64 for quite
>a bit, because I was unfortunately very busy with a study and other
>things, but now I have a lot of time.
>
>If anyone could fill me in, or even point me to the data in question
>(e.g. ISO images, patches, etc.), let me know. Feel free to also
>e-mail me, if necessary or desired.
There are some pointers at
[🔎] 4FA2A12B.4080507@users.sourceforge.net">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 4FA2A12B.4080507@users.sourceforge.net
>(I have a number of video cards I want to try under Linux IA-64 as
>well.)
>
> - MG
I intend to work as an ia64 porter.
Who would like to step forward to help maintaining the ia64 arch in
Debian?
We need more people and you don't have to be a Debian developer.
Reply to: