On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:31:23 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > I wonder whether I might be able to get some kind of response on my > proposal to upload a tiff with libtiff5-alt-dev. To help you make a > decision, I'm supplying the information you probably need. I'm hoping > you'll be able to give me a quick decision, or at least give me a quick > response indicating when you will be able to make a decision. I've laid > everything out here, so you should just be able to read through this. > That plan doesn't seem entirely crazy. Rather convoluted, but I guess there's no way around that if you want that thing to work. A case I've seen more often is reverse depends of libgeotiff that can't be built because libgeotiff-dev depends on libtiff5-dev and they want libtiff-dev. There's probably no good way to solve that though. And *sigh* every time I look there's more people that think build-depending on libtiff5-dev is a good idea. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature