[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: (cryptmount #672678) unmet dependency on libdevmapper



On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 18:28:20 +0000, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 02:50 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:31:33PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
> > > This bug blocks lvm2 from migrating to testing. Maybe cryptmount should
> > > temporarily removed from testing? Or are tools wrong, and lvm2 update
> > > don't make situation any worse than it's now?
> > 
> > Has release managers opinion about this?
>  I'm the sponsor of Richard, the maintainer of cryptmount. He has fixed
> this issue some days ago and asked me about to upload that. However it
> changes old debian/copyright entries. He changes the 'closes: #xxx
> reason' lines to 'reason, closes: #xxx' ones.
> It's a bit unclear for me if it's advised or not. Can't recall any
> policy about this, but AFAICR, it should not be changed. In short, may I
> upload the package despite the altering of changelog wording?
> 
It doesn't matter.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: