Hello, and thanks for the quick answer. Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org> (24/05/2012): > binNMU should work without FTBFS, but as I said we will update the > packages this week, so I guess binNMU is not needed. OK. > pkg-fso is the Maintainer of all reverse dependencies, so I assumed > that coordination with the release team is not strictly needed. I > will send a message next time. That could look like it, but your packages might get entangled in some other transition, making it painful for everyone. Also, we usually coordinate with ftpmasters the removal of old binaries, so that the packages can migrate as soon as they are ready (otherwise, out of date binaries postpone this migration). Mraw, KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature