[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#674128: marked as done (nmu: fso-deviced_0.9.5+git20120214-1 fso-gsmd_0.5.0+git20120305-1)



Your message dated Wed, 23 May 2012 19:25:40 +0100
with message-id <1337797540.16492.5.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#674128: nmu: fso-deviced_0.9.5+git20120214-1 fso-gsmd_0.5.0+git20120305-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #674128,
regarding nmu: fso-deviced_0.9.5+git20120214-1 fso-gsmd_0.5.0+git20120305-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
674128: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674128
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu fso-deviced_0.9.5+git20120214-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libfsotransport1"
nmu fso-gsmd_0.5.0+git20120305-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libfsotransport1"


libfsotransport (0.9.8+git20120308-1) renamed libfsotransport0 to
libfsotransport1 [1], but the reverse dependencies have not been rebuilt
so far. These two packages seem to be the only ones affected.

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libf/libfsotransport/news/20120329T160359Z.html


Andreas



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 10:59 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> nmu fso-deviced_0.9.5+git20120214-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libfsotransport1"
> nmu fso-gsmd_0.5.0+git20120305-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libfsotransport1"
> 
> 
> libfsotransport (0.9.8+git20120308-1) renamed libfsotransport0 to
> libfsotransport1 [1], but the reverse dependencies have not been rebuilt
> so far. These two packages seem to be the only ones affected.
> 
> [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libf/libfsotransport/news/20120329T160359Z.html

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam



--- End Message ---

Reply to: