On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.05.2012 17:45, Philipp Kern wrote:
> This doesn't mean that we shouldn't have gcc-4.7 in wheezy as an
alternative,
> just that it is highly problematic as the default at this point of
the release
> cycle. +1 on the revert from me, sadly.
in summary, these are getting addressed faster than these are
submitted. Please
lets wait until the end of June if to make this decision or not.
Hell no. End of June is when we'll be frozen. Not when we'll keep
messing around with big toolchain changes.