On 27.04.2012 10:05, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:> What do you think? Should I upload to unstable now or should > I wait until the testing transition is over once? I'll take a look afterwards. Thanks for your work!But please test them, esp with respect to upgrades. When I am back (Kamikochi climbing Maehokadake, then Sadogashima) I will build new packages and upload them.> debian-release people? Advise? I'd like to know an advice too.Too late, I am leaving soon. Will have to wait after Golden Week.
My answer would have been the same in any case - if texfam is obsolete and relatively unused then I'd prefer to look at getting the testing transition out of the way sooner rather than later; that also means there's no rush to get texfam updated just to get things transitioned.
The dvi2{dvi,ps} NMUs will hit the archive over the next couple of days, so I'd propose that we look at transitioning texlive-* and the libkpathsea reverse-dependencies early next week, removing texfam from testing and breaking it in unstable in the process - texlive people, does that sound okay?
Regards, Adam