[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#668461: marked as done (RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1)

Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:40:33 +0200
with message-id <20120412184033.GW22243@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#668461: RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #668461,
regarding RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
668461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668461
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Hello,

request-tracker3.8 represents an old (in deep maintenance
mode by upstream) branch of RT, and it shouldn't be released with
wheezy. There is an RC bug #647126 to hint that it shouldn't be
released, but I'd quite like to have it removed from testing now to
bring any issues out of the woodwork before it is removed altogether
(having it unstable for a little while long will also be useful for
maintaining backports, should there be further upstream releases).

Thanks,
Dominic.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 00:13:41 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:

> request-tracker3.8 represents an old (in deep maintenance
> mode by upstream) branch of RT, and it shouldn't be released with
> wheezy. There is an RC bug #647126 to hint that it shouldn't be
> released, but I'd quite like to have it removed from testing now to
> bring any issues out of the woodwork before it is removed altogether
> (having it unstable for a little while long will also be useful for
> maintaining backports, should there be further upstream releases).
> 
remove hint added.  Might be worth filing a bug against the
release-notes pseudo-package (tagged 'wheezy') so we don't forget to
mention this before the release, if there's something users need to do
to get their installation properly upgraded?

Thanks,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: