[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#668206: marked as done (nmu: rebuild against libsword9)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:54:17 +0100
with message-id <1334084057.8630.13.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#668206: nmu: rebuild against libsword9
has caused the Debian Bug report #668206,
regarding nmu: rebuild against libsword9
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
668206: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668206
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Please schedule the following nmu to migrate to new libsword9 library.

nmu biblememorizer . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9"
nmu bibletime . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9"
nmu xiphos . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9"

dw biblememorizer . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3"
dw bibletime . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3"
dw xiphos . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3"

--
Regards,

Dmitrijs.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 18:40 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Please schedule the following nmu to migrate to new libsword9 library.

This should really be a transition bug, not an NMU request; as such, it
should also preferably have been filed /before/ you started the
transition, not afterwards...

However, as it doesn't appear to clash with any other ongoing
transitions - scheduled.

> nmu biblememorizer . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9"
> nmu bibletime . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9"
> nmu xiphos . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libsword9"
> 
> dw biblememorizer . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3"
> dw bibletime . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3"
> dw xiphos . ALL . -m "libsword-dev >= 1.6.2+dfsg-3"

The latter argument to a dep-wait is a package relationship so
"libsword-dev (>= 1.6.2+dfsg-3)".  "libsword9" was easier though, so I
used that.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: