Bug#667997: marked as done (release.debian.org: please age inspircd 2.0.5-0.1)
Your message dated Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:53:51 +0100
with message-id <1333886031.24386.125.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#667997: release.debian.org: please age inspircd 2.0.5-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #667997,
regarding release.debian.org: please age inspircd 2.0.5-0.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
667997: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667997
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I should have uploaded this package with urgency=medium or higher, because of
the security fix but I forgot. Please age it appropriately - either medium
or high, I don't mind which.
Thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 00:57 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I should have uploaded this package with urgency=medium or higher, because of
> the security fix but I forgot. Please age it appropriately - either medium
> or high, I don't mind which.
A security fix and nearly three years of upstream development, by the
look of it. :-/ Due to the size of the diff, I've opted for medium and
aged the package to need five days in testing.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: