Your message dated Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:06:35 +0100 with message-id <1333490795.8980.12.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #622134, regarding transition: openssl 1.0.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: transition: openssl 1.0.0
- From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:02:14 +0200
- Message-id: <20110410140214.GA22031@roeckx.be>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition This is to track the transition of openssl 1.0.0. Most of the problems are related to dropping SSLv2 support. Kurt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 622134-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:06:35 +0100
- Message-id: <1333490795.8980.12.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1333314164.5757.34.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- References: <20110410140214.GA22031@roeckx.be> <20111006184622.GN2757@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20111017200857.GA23619@roeckx.be> <20111108225640.GS3151@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20111117211020.GA13320@roeckx.be> <[🔎] 1333314164.5757.34.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 22:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 22:10 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Ace now seems to be the only one left in testing. > > It still is, but I think we're really close to getting rid of it now. > > The most recent version of ace built successfully on all architectures, > and I binNMUed the packages still depending on the older libraries > (diagnostics/armel and ivman/{amd64,armel}) earlier today. The old > libraries have now been decrufted, so after the next dinstall we should > just be waiting for ace to be old enough to enter testing; I'll try and > remember to do a test run tomorrow to confirm that. I aged ace a little and openssl098 was removed from testing in tonight's britney run; I'm therefore closing this bug. Regards, Adam
--- End Message ---