On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 19:06:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:52 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: > > The current plan is to EOL MPICH and LAM by removing all reverse > > dependencies on those packages. One big step in this direction would be > > via mpi-defaults. The current version depends on LAM/MPI for arches > > where Open MPI is not supported (yet). A package is prepared that will > > depend on MPICH2 on these arches. After uploading that, binNMUs are > > needed for the depending packages. > > How is this transition progressing? I note that there are still 10 open > bugs listed at [1]. > > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=old-mpi-eol;users=debian-science@lists.debian.org > The new mpi-defaults was uploaded to sid in December, here's the current state. Reverse-dependencies of lam left in testing: - apbs; binNMUs scheduled - cctools; fixed in unstable, but FTBFS (#661658) - clustalw-mpi; needs a bug filed - fftw; binNMUs scheduled - gerris; FTBFS (#652258) - ghemical; binNMUs scheduled - hdf5; needs #631019 sorted so libhdf5-lam-1.8.4 can be removed - hpcc; binNMUs scheduled - libghemical; binNMUs scheduled - libgpiv; FTBFS (#657199) - mpqc; FTBFS on mips, given back for now - mrbayes; unbuildable on kfreebsd (#661659, #661663) - mumps; in the middle of a SONAME bump (#650642, #659898, #651452, something else with getdp, petsc/slepc's own bumps - netpipe; #571449 - parmetis; binNMUs scheduled - regina-normal; binNMUs scheduled - rmpi; binNMUs scheduled - starpu; binNMUs scheduled - tessa; fixed in sid - xmpi; #571448, should apparently be removed Reverse-dependencies of mpich left in testing: - meep; #661661 - netpipe; see above - xmds; fixed in sid Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature