[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#654417: marked as done (transition: glew)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:58:00 +0100
with message-id <20120227135759.GA19280@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#654417: Migration on good tracks
has caused the Debian Bug report #654417,
regarding transition: glew
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
654417: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654417
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

I'm filing this bug for the transition of glew package.

On August 2011 the new 1.7.0 stable version has been released by
upstream.

On December 27, 2011 a testing-purpose package has been uploaded to
experimental and with the huge help from Luca Falavigna (dktrkranz) it
was tested building with all its 51 reverse dependencies[1].

None of the packages in that list were directly affected by the
transition (the only FTBFS is non-glew dependent).

My sponsor for this package, Alessio Treglia (alessio), asked me to use
SONAME-independent -dev packages (libglew-dev and libglewmx-dev), while
the former versions were libglew1.6-dev and libglewmx1.6-dev.
"Provides" field has been anyway set to ease the process.

List of sources depending on glew following:
* avogadro
* ball
* bino
* blender
* cegui-mk2
* enblend-enfuse
* frogatto
* gimp-plugin-registry
* gource
* hugin
* imagevis3d
* koffice
* libsfml
* lightspark
* megaglest
* mesa-demos
* meshlab
* mupen64plus-video-z64
* opencsg
* openmsx
* performous
* phlipple
* projectm
* pymol
* python-pyglew
* qutemol
* renpy
* rlvm
* rss-glx
* sofa-framework
* soya
* spring
* supertux
* trigger-rally
* tulip
* widelands

Thanks for your time and patience.


[1] http://debomatic64.debian.net/glew/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o
contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e'
risultato non infetto.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi again.

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (25/02/2012):
> Broken packages (in unstable): arb/non-free openmsx rlvm spring tulip
> 
> The following packages are marked as bad on the tracker[1]:
>  - arb/non-free, missing libmotif-dev on other platforms, so not
>    binNMU'd.

Building non-free issue: #661280

>  - openmsx: binNMU FTBFS

#660415

>  - rlvm: sid-only

BinNMU'd on all platforms but powerpc, where it FTBFS: #638271

>  - spring: binNMU FTBFS

#660450

>  - tulip: binNMU FTBFS, sid-only

#650653

> So I've hinted arb/non-free, openmsx, and spring for removal so that
> the transition can happen. Since outdated binaries were still around,
> I “simulated” a britney dry run by “forcing” glew in, which seemed to
> work fine.
> 
> Hopefully tomorrow morning's (10:00Z) run should see packages migrate.
> 
> I'll make sure all the above-mentioned packages have bugs filed against
> them, and I'll see what needs to be done to remove old glew binaries
> from testing.

Done, and old glew binaries are gone. ben file moved away accordingly.

Closing this bug report.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: