[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#657758: squeeze: Misses policykit-1 DSA 2319-1 security update from 2011-10-08



On 28.01.2012 18:31, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 17:10 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>> It seems that the DSA 2319-1 security update for policykit-1 was not
>> copied into squeeze-proposed-updates:
>>
>>  policykit-1 | 0.96-4          | squeeze          | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
>>  policykit-1 | 0.96-4+squeeze1 | squeeze-security | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
>>
>> The fix was made on October 8, 2011.
> 
> As was mentioned on IRC, and for the record, this is because the version
> on security.d.o was built against an .orig tarball that doesn't match
> the version in the main archive, so it was rejected as soon as it hit
> ftp-master.

Sorry again for this mess.

Would the stable release team be ok with a no-changes upload of
0.96-4+squeeze1 to stable (as 0.96-4+squeeze2)?

debdiff attached.

Cheers,
Michael


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 982e895..6cb2e57 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+policykit-1 (0.96-4+squeeze2) stable; urgency=low
+
+  * Upload 0.96-4+squeeze1 to stable without further changes. The
+    0.96-4+squeeze1 upload to stable-security was mistakenly made with an orig
+    tarball which didn't match the one from ftp-master so the security fix was
+    not automatically included in the next stable point release.
+    (Closes: #657758)
+
+ -- Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>  Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:31:09 +0100
+
 policykit-1 (0.96-4+squeeze1) stable-security; urgency=high
 
   * debian/patches/02_proc_pid_race.patch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: