Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:49:58 +0100 with message-id <20120123174958.GA24296@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Processed: tagging 617460, block 617460 with 614404 has caused the Debian Bug report #617460, regarding pu: package zoneminder/1.24.2-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 617460: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617460 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: pu: package zoneminder/1.24.2-8
- From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:53:26 -0800
- Message-id: <20110309035326.GD10855@talon.fglan>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu i'd like to upload a new version of zoneminder to squeeze in order to fix #614404, which causes a wide variety of IP cameras to fail on the amd64 architecture. in the bug report there is a patch that i've tested that fixes the problem, although also generates numerous new compiler warnings. as best i can tell, the warnings do not appear to actually cause a problem. live well, vagrant
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
- Cc: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 617460-done@bugs.debian.org, Peter Howard <pjh@northern-ridge.com.au>, 614404@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Processed: tagging 617460, block 617460 with 614404
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:49:58 +0100
- Message-id: <20120123174958.GA24296@mraw.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20120123170022.GA3372@talon.fglan>
- References: <1305330654-2476-bts-adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> <handler.s.C.130533069127352.transcript@bugs.debian.org> <[🔎] 20120122181941.GD353@mraw.org> <[🔎] 20120123170022.GA3372@talon.fglan>
Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> (23/01/2012): > thanks for checking in. No problem. > the changes are a bit too intrusive with the new upstream versions- there are > no specific series of patches that fixed it upstream, and the patch (for the > version in squeeze) didn't really work well for me, although others report that > amd64 works fine for them even without the patch, so maybe bug #614404 should > be downgraded to important. > > perhaps we should close 617460, as i don't see a fix in the near future... That was my (outsider) feeling. Let's do that then. Thanks. Mraw, KiBi.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---