[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#617460: marked as done (pu: package zoneminder/1.24.2-8)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:49:58 +0100
with message-id <20120123174958.GA24296@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Processed: tagging 617460, block 617460 with 614404
has caused the Debian Bug report #617460,
regarding pu: package zoneminder/1.24.2-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

617460: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617460
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

i'd like to upload a new version of zoneminder to squeeze in order to fix
#614404, which causes a wide variety of IP cameras to fail on the amd64

in the bug report there is a patch that i've tested that fixes the problem,
although also generates numerous new compiler warnings. as best i can tell, the
warnings do not appear to actually cause a problem.

live well,

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> (23/01/2012):
> thanks for checking in.

No problem.

> the changes are a bit too intrusive with the new upstream versions- there are
> no specific series of patches that fixed it upstream, and the patch (for the
> version in squeeze) didn't really work well for me, although others report that
> amd64 works fine for them even without the patch, so maybe bug #614404 should
> be downgraded to important.
> perhaps we should close 617460, as i don't see a fix in the near future...

That was my (outsider) feeling. Let's do that then. Thanks.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---

Reply to: