[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#649339: marked as done (vtk 5.8 transition)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:15:41 +0100
with message-id <20120115101541.GE9839@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#649339: vtk 5.8 transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #649339,
regarding vtk 5.8 transition
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
649339: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649339
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition


Hi,

I would like to upload vtk-5.8.0 to unstable. It fixes the dependency
issues we had with vtk-5.6 but might also break a few packages.
Is it a bad time to start the transition?

-Dominique

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 21:52:15 -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to upload vtk-5.8.0 to unstable. It fixes the dependency
> issues we had with vtk-5.6 but might also break a few packages.
> Is it a bad time to start the transition?
> 
Done now after removal of itksnap, wrapitk-python and elmerfem from
testing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: