Re: Proposed stable update for procps
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 19:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 20:21 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > * Adam D. Barratt <email@example.com> [110803 19:50]:
> > > I'd be happy with the fix for #632749, certainly. What's the practical
> > > impact of #635553? Particularly given that it is still open in
> > > unstable, I'm inclined to say we should skip it, at least for the
> > > moment.
> > It's probably harmless, it will just be an extra stat() that will
> > always fail. If future kernel versions introduce this interface, it
> > might or might not become a problem.
> In that case, let's just stick with #632749 for the moment. Please feel
> free to upload that (which I assume is the update to
> gnu-kbsd-version.patch + appropriate changelog stanza).