[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#628529: marked as done (transition: ICU transition (4.4 -> 4.8))

Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2011 00:49:03 +0100
with message-id <20111218234903.GT24471@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: ICU transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #628529,
regarding transition: ICU transition (4.4 -> 4.8)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
628529: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628529
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Turning this into a bugreport.

On 05/29/2011 10:19 PM, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:

I'd like to schedule a transition for ICU from 4.4 to 4.8.  In the past
several ICU transitions, it has been sufficient to do a binary NMU for
each reverse dependency, and there's little reason to believe that this
time should be any different.  There are a few API changes, but they are
mostly for interfaces that have been deprecated for a long time, and
this is pretty much comparable to earlier ICU releases.  I will wait to
upload ICU to unstable until I get an okay from the release team and
until I hear from openoffice.org maintainers.



Regards,

--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 16:19:00 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:

> I'd like to schedule a transition for ICU from 4.4 to 4.8.  In the past
> several ICU transitions, it has been sufficient to do a binary NMU for
> each reverse dependency, and there's little reason to believe that this
> time should be any different.  There are a few API changes, but they are
> mostly for interfaces that have been deprecated for a long time, and
> this is pretty much comparable to earlier ICU releases.  I will wait to
> upload ICU to unstable until I get an okay from the release team and
> until I hear from openoffice.org maintainers.
> 
libicu44 is (finally) gone from wheezy, closing the transition tracking
bug.

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---
Reply to: