Hi Julien Thanks for your fast reply first of all. On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 03:53:01PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 15:23:17 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: binnmu > > > > Hi > > > > dw udav_0.6.3-2 . ALL . -m "libmgl-dev (>= 1.11.2-1)" > > nmu udav_0.6.3-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against mathgl (>= 1.11.2-1)" > > > > udav currently segfaults with: > > > > udav: Symbol `mgls_base_cmd' has different size in shared object, consider re-linking > > Segmentation fault > > > > which might be due the recents changes on mathgl. I tried a rebuild on > > amd64 and udav worked again, so I would like to request binnmu for > > udav. The dw is not strictly needed, but as there was a recent upload > > today it would be best to rebuild udav again the same version. > > > > Could you please reschedule binNMU's for udav? > > > That sounds like mathgl broke its ABI. If so, that needs to be fixed. > So, no. mathgl itself had multiple issues indeed with the symbols file which was added. See changelog entries between 1.11.0.1-1 and the most recent upload. http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/m/mathgl/current/changelog.html I'm cc'ing Dimitrios if he has an idea on this. mathgl should be in a much stable shape now as it was previously. Dimitrios do you have some insights on possible ABI break inbetween 1.10 -> 1.11? If rebuilding udav is no alternative, we could remove udav from testing, I'm preparing a new udav version which could be ready in the next few days, and then let this version migrate to testing. udav 0.7.1.2 will have a stricter dependency on libmgl5, and will need at least (>= 1.11) anyway. Regards Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature