Quoting Adam D. Barratt (firstname.lastname@example.org): > tag 652545 + moreinfo squeeze > thanks > > On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 14:08 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > I would like to update samba in squeeze to fix #652048. This bug is > > very annoying for people who use samba servers with non encrypted > > passwords and the fix (which upstream also pushed in their stable > > release) is trivial. > > Does this issue also affect samba 3.6, as shipped in unstable? The code > paths look very similar, but I don't know the codebase well enough to > trivially spot if the issue would still be relevant in later versions. Interesting question. I was indeed convinced that the patch made its way to 3.6 but it apparently didn't. Upstream bug tracker doesn't say a word about 3.6 or about the patch not being relevant for 3.6. I'm checking this with upstream....but it probably just got forgotten, so, yes, 3.6 could be affected by this bug.
Description: Digital signature