Re: Bug#629511: can report invalid data as valid in untaint mode

To: gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Cc: 629511-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#629511: can report invalid data as valid in untaint mode
From: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 14:52:40 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20111216145240.GC2461@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20111215201603.GD9203@belanna.comodo.priv.at>
References: <20111214224627.12964B7E0BB@lupin.localdomain> <[🔎] 20111215201603.GD9203@belanna.comodo.priv.at>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:16:03PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Attached.
> 
> (I hope switching to source format 3.0 is ok; it seems less invasive
> than adding quilt stuff manually and less ugly than directly patching
> the source.)

Hmm, I think debian-release will probably react with some caution, but
that's up to them; SRM, comments please?



-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#629511: can report invalid data as valid in untaint mode
  - From: gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: tagging 639871
Next by Date: Bug#639871: gupnp transition also needs to include newer gupnp-igd
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#629511: can report invalid data as valid in untaint mode
Next by thread: Re: Bug#629511: can report invalid data as valid in untaint mode
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread