slpvm: should it be in Debian?

[Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>]

Hi,

I'm working through the list of build failures for armhf while we
bring up the new architecture, and I've just got to slpvm. I'm
concerned about the status of this package:

 * the last maintainer upload into Debian was over 2 years ago
 * there is a serious bug open against it for over 2 months without
   any response from you as the maintainer (FTBFS)
 * a very low popcon score suggests it has a very small number of
   users

Please re-consider if this package should be in the archive or not.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
"Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out
 whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast."
 Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html