[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#648321: marked as done (transition: tracker 0.12)

Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:14:47 +0100
with message-id <4EC91967.808@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#648321: transition: tracker 0.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #648321,
regarding transition: tracker 0.12
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
648321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648321
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

with GNOME 3.0 having migrated to testing, I'd like to start a
mini-transition for tracker-0.12 (which will be a prerequisite for GNOME
3.2).
Affected packages

grilo-plugins
bognor-regis
totem
brasero

I've started filing bugs for that some time ago [1] and already fixed
nautilus, gtk+2.0 and gtk+3.0 to support both libtracker-sparql-0.10 and
0.12 via dlopen. tracker 0.12 packages have been in experimental for a
while and build on all architectures.

For totem, brasero and grilo-plugins, I have patches ready to update
from libtracker-sparql-0.10 to libtracker-sparql-0.12.

bognor-regis is a bit more complicated, as it still uses
libtracker-client-0.10, which has been dropped completely. Unfortunately
I haven't received a reply so far from the bognor-regis maintainer and
the upstream repository (if I found the correct one [2]) looks pretty much
dead. It has to be noted though, that bognor-regis is a leaf package, so
in case its maintainer has no interest in porting it himself, it could
be removed from testing without ill effects.

Please let me know when I can start with moving tracker 0.12 from
experimental to unstable.

Cheers,
Michael

[1]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=biebl@debian.org;tag=tracker-0.12
[2] http://meego.gitorious.org/meego-netbook-ux/bognor-regis
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-2-486
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Not really necessary to get the RT involved, so spare them the time and
close it.

-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: