Re: Bug#587315: 'multipath: unknown hardware handler type' with hardware_handler "1 hp-sw"
- To: rrs@debian.org
 
- Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, Thijs Kinkhorst <thijs@debian.org>
 
- Subject: Re: Bug#587315: 'multipath: unknown hardware handler type' with hardware_handler "1 hp-sw"
 
- From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
 
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:38:09 +0000
 
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1320176289.22945.2.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
 
- In-reply-to: <4EAEB484.2010201@debian.org>
 
- References: <c8b16b4d271145d373807deff1bd7068@mailbox.uvt.nl>	 <CAP0eoCwGYHWi5K1WYWQTseFp49ms+nfgVjJgq1+xTPjkzbr9Kw@mail.gmail.com>	 <CAP0eoCyLF0YtjwGDKAkwKUadtSBBf_8Ln8fvsCaTj_etCAdUnA@mail.gmail.com>	 <4EAE4A31.4000501@debian.org>	 <22c932491fe87fa8ecf9c66ebbc090a0.squirrel@wm.kinkhorst.nl>	 <4EAEB484.2010201@debian.org>
 
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 20:15 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: 
> On 10/31/2011 06:33 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Mon, October 31, 2011 08:11, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> >> > I would like to propose an update to the multipath-tools package for
> >> > Squeeze. This proposed upload fixes 2 issues:
> >> >
> >> > * [b5f7694] Change HP hardware hanlder to hp_sw.
> >> >     Thanks to Phil (Closes: 587315)
> > I can advocate this change. We ran into this problem when connecting a
> > Squeeze machine to HP storage and this patch solved our problem. Having
> > the fix in stable would restore Squeeze compatibility with ranges of
> > HP-manufactured storage systems.
> 
> Release Team,
> 
> Please let me know with an ack. Only then I'll upload it to
> stable-proposed-updates.
Thanks for working on this.  Whilst I appreciate your not uploading
already, I will note that the time between your original request and the
message above was only seven hours, which is possibly a little soon to
be expecting an answer, particularly on a weekday. :)
The hp_sw change looks fine.  In terms of the documentation changes, is
there an ETA for getting them uploaded to unstable?  Also:
++of this path. Higher number have a higher priority.
s/number/&s/
++regex can be of SCSI H:B:T:L format  Ex: 1:0:.:. , *:0:0:.
++.I devname 
++regex can be of device name format  Ex: sda , sd.e
s/can be of/can be in/g
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: