[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#646340: marked as done (nmu: yiff_2.14.5-7)



Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:38:17 +0100
with message-id <20111101163817.GD3100@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#646340: nmu: yiff_2.14.5-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #646340,
regarding nmu: yiff_2.14.5-7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
646340: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646340
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu


nmu yiff_2.14.5-7 . ALL . -m "Restore liby-dev binary package"

Rationale:
a recent bison upload [0] incorrectly overwrote yiff's liby-dev, which
has been dominated later on. A subsequent bison upload fixed previous
mistake [1], yiff's liby-dev has to be restored, though.

Hopefully, binNMUing yiff would be enough to solve the issue, otherwise
I will convert this bug in a request to upload a fixed yiff with proper
epoch to restore missing binaries.

[0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bison/news/20111003T063216Z.html
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/bison/news/20111011T161715Z.html



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Nov  1, 2011 at 16:42:34 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 14:43:18 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> 
> > Hopefully, binNMUing yiff would be enough to solve the issue, otherwise
> > I will convert this bug in a request to upload a fixed yiff with proper
> > epoch to restore missing binaries.
> > 
> dak really shouldn't allow this to work.  Scheduled, though, let's see
> if it's enough.
> 
Looks like that worked, they're all yours now (in NEW).  Closing.

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---

Reply to: