Re: Please binNMU fluxbox
Hello,
During my upload of fluxbox 1.3.2, I accidentally built the amd64 .deb that was
uploaded to ftp-master on Ubuntu, not Debian.
In order to prevent any issues regarding versioned libraries, as well as fix
the themes that are shipped in the package, I'd like to request a binNMU against
fluxbox 1.3.2-1 on amd64. I've filed a bug against Fluxbox on the matter.
nmu fluxbox_1.3.2-1 . amd64 . -m 'Rebuild with correct vendor, see #647178.'
Thanks so much,
Paul
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647178
--
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
During my upload of fluxbox 1.3.2, I accidentally built the amd64 .deb that was
uploaded to ftp-master on Ubuntu, not Debian.
In order to prevent any issues regarding versioned libraries, as well as fix
the themes that are shipped in the package, I'd like to request a binNMU against
fluxbox 1.3.2-1 on amd64. I've filed a bug against Fluxbox on the matter.
nmu fluxbox_1.3.2-1 . amd64 . -m 'Rebuild with correct vendor, see #647178.'
Thanks so much,
Paul
[1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647178
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=GfXD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: