Re: hint for lxc required

To: <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>
Cc: <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: hint for lxc required
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:26:00 +0100
Message-id: <689d1e23d8044d788d6a1e529e7b8b96@adsl.funky-badger.org>
In-reply-to: <4E96BBC4.1010809@progress-technologies.net>
References: <4E96B68F.3070904@progress-technologies.net> <4a539856d42f2956cd034bebb3d5d6e1@adsl.funky-badger.org> <4E96BBC4.1010809@progress-technologies.net>

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:21:56 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:

On 10/13/2011 12:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It doesn't need a hint, it needs the FTBFS fixing - see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxc
i already requested the removal of those archs some time ago, see#640351.

Indeed, although the list of architectures in the subject and thosementioned in the body are different so it would appear that only thoselisted in the subject were actioned. You'll need to submit a new requestto ftp-master for the others.


Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

References:
- hint for lxc required
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>
- Re: hint for lxc required
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: hint for lxc required
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>

Prev by Date: Re: hint for lxc required
Next by Date: Processed: block 635515 with 644592 644649
Previous by thread: Re: hint for lxc required
Next by thread: Re: hint for lxc required
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread