Bug#640094: marked as done (nmu: gdal_1.7.3-6)
Your message dated Fri, 2 Sep 2011 19:42:17 +0200
with message-id <20110902174217.GF2820@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#640094: nmu: gdal_1.7.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #640094,
regarding nmu: gdal_1.7.3-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
640094: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640094
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Last building against libdap 3.11.1-3 introduced inconsistency which
resulted in wrong libdapclient/server dependencies. So a rebuild
is required.
nmu gdal_1.7.3-6 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against current libdap"
dw gdal_1.7.3-6 . ALL . -m '(>= libdap_3.11.1-5)'
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:21:50 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> Last building against libdap 3.11.1-3 introduced inconsistency which
> resulted in wrong libdapclient/server dependencies. So a rebuild
> is required.
>
> nmu gdal_1.7.3-6 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against current libdap"
Scheduled.
> dw gdal_1.7.3-6 . ALL . -m '(>= libdap_3.11.1-5)'
>
FWIW this bit doesn't make sense, the syntax is the same as a Depends
field, e.g. 'libdap-dev (>= 3.11.1-5)'. Not really necessary though, as
libdap 3.11.1-5 is built on all archs now.
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---
Reply to: