[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#636945: pu: package ace/5.7.7-4



(please leave pkg-ace-devel@ in CC:)

Hello,

Le 07/08/2011 17:31, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 12:54 +0200, Thomas Girard wrote:
>> as per #630897 ace needs to be repackaged in stable only.
>>
>> Details available at [1]; just let me know if something is missing or
>> unclear.
> [...]
>> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630897#37
> 
> Sorry, this seems to have fallen off our radar at some point.  As a
> general comment, when you're providing pre-built packages for people to
> check, it's generally helpful if the .dsc / .changes are signed, to
> provide some sort of trust path for the download. 

Sorry about that.

> Overall, the re-packaging looks okay; thanks.  Checking the diff was
> made slightly more annoying by the fact that the source package is
> tarball-in-tarball and packaged in a way that debdiff's automatic
> support for that format doesn't seem to like, but never mind. 

Yes. Packaging was overhauled in unstable to avoid that.

> One quick question on the changes, however:
> 
> -ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=high
> +ace (5.7.7+dfsg-1) stable; urgency=low
> [...]
> +ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=low
> 
> Why was the urgency on the -4 stanza changed?

My mistake, good catch, thanks! (I guess I forgot to commit the urgency
bump; hence the issue.)

I'll make a new package and publish it again at the same location,
signed this time.

Regards,

Thomas



Reply to: