Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Time passed, and a version of tasksel which implements the "real > package" approach will migrate to testing in the next day or so. > > joeyh / -boot - could you confirm that the task overrides {can,should} > be dropped (and thus the fields removed from the Packages files for > testing) once the current version of tasksel migrates? Yes, that's right. > From the britney point-of-view, I'm looking at dropping most of the > current tasksel-meta-faux-* generation in favour of a single faux > package which depends on all of the real task-* packages. This would > allow us to track co-installability of the tasks. That sounds about right.. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature