On lun., 2011-08-01 at 22:48 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 22:11 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > So it doesn't look really good, I guess those were fixed somehow in > 3.0 > > branch, but as 2.32 is starting to be a bit old, I'm not really sure > > there's much support on that, and especially not on > --enable-gtk3=yes. > > > > I'll try a bit more tomorrow, but I guess that means entangling to > that > > evolution transition (or removing evolution from testing, but that > might > > be a nightmare too?) > > Seems best to patch the current evolution in unstable. Attached is a > patch that makes it compile, but i haven't tested it any further. > Thanks, but I just uploaded a fixed evolution (with the same patch, obviously :) Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part