Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:44:15 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > 1) The modified gnustep-make package will have no trouble migrating to
> > testing (before the transition even commences), so it would make
> > GNUstep development in wheezy broken, just like it is now in sid.
> >
> Broken how?
Packages end up linking with libobjc3, while -base and -gui are linked
with libobjc2.
> > 2) Building the GNUstep packages with the non-default compiler on ia64
> > and sparc is, strictly speaking, a policy violation.
> >
> What part of policy?
None; it appears I am making a mistake. I was pretty sure that there
was something like "Packages should be built with the default
compiler", but it seems I was wrong.
Reply to:
- References:
- Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
- From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
- Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
- From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
- Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
- From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
- Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>