[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#622754: marked as done (Please binNMU listed packages against libdb-dev (db5.1 transition))

Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2011 17:22:15 +0200
with message-id <4DD535A7.6000702@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#622754: Updated list of binNMUs needed for db5.1 transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #622754,
regarding Please binNMU listed packages against libdb-dev (db5.1 transition)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
622754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622754
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu hpsockd_0.17 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621104)"
nmu isync_1.0.4-2.1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621106)"
nmu bind9_1:9.7.3.dfsg-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621110)"
nmu pkspxy_0.5-10 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621111)"
nmu qtstalker_0.32-3.2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621112)"
nmu dkim-milter_2.8.2.dfsg-1  . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621347)"
nmu batv-milter_0.4.0.dfsg-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621348)"
nmu dnshistory_1.3-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621349)"
nmu hotkeys_0.5.7.4-0.3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621354)"
nmu jabberd2_2.2.8-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621356)"
nmu iproute_20110315-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621387)"
nmu nmh_1.3-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621397)"
nmu citadel_7.84-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621404)"
nmu libapache2-mod-qos_9.54-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621405)"
nmu log4cxx_0.10.0-1.1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621407)"
nmu evolution-exchange_2.32.2-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621414)"
nmu librcc_0.2.9-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621417)"
nmu opendkim_2.1.3+dfsg-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621418)"
nmu libpam-ccreds_10-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621424)"
nmu heimdal_1.4.0-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621416)"
nmu perdition_1.19~rc4-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621427)"
nmu chise-base_0.3.0-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621430)"
nmu moc_1:2.5.0~alpha4+svn20091009-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621429)"
nmu webdruid_0.5.4-12 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621433)"
nmu skksearch_0.0-17 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621434)"
nmu dovecot_1:1.2.15-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621428)"
nmu nss-updatedb_10-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621441)"
nmu ggz-server_0.0.14.1-1.5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621439)"
nmu webalizer_2.01.10-32.7 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621446)"
nmu redland_1.0.13-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621444)"
nmu jigdo_0.7.3-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621451)"
nmu xemacs21_21.4.22-3.1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621456)"
nmu pam_1.1.2-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621457)"
nmu cairo-dock-plugins_2.3.0~0rc1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against new libdb-dev to use libdb5.1 (Closes: #621454)"

I have handchecked every package in this batch to compile cleanly and
links to libdb5.1 in updated unstable amd64 pbuilder environment.

The rest of the packages with db5.1 tag bug are either:
a) depending on non-generic libdb-dev (libdb4.[678]-dev)
b) non-buildable due some other error (openssl transition, opie removal)
c) tagged as pending by maintainer
d) built against db5.1 header, but linked to db4.8 library (#621450)

Regards,
Ondrej

The script used for checking (for reference and possible future use):

apt-get install libdb-dev
echo "libdb-dev hold" | dpkg --set-selections
P=<package>;
apt-get source $P && apt-get -y build-dep $P && \
cd $(find /tmp/buildd/ -type d -name $P-*) && \
dpkg-buildpackage && \
for deb in /tmp/buildd/*.deb; do dpkg --info $deb | grep libdb; done;

(Eye check for libdb5.1 dependency.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers maverick-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'maverick-updates'), (500, 'maverick-security'), (500, 'maverick-proposed'), (500, 'maverick-backports'), (500, 'maverick')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 19/05/2011 15:35, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> this is more up-to-date list of packages which could be binNMUed to
> help db5.1 transition and they haven't been scheduled to binNMU yet.
> 
> […]
> 

All scheduled.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: