[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#626561: marked as done (RM: libafs-perl/2.6.2-1)



Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 00:40:45 +0200
with message-id <20110513224045.GH2809@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#626561: RM: libafs-perl/2.6.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #626561,
regarding RM: libafs-perl/2.6.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
626561: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626561
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Please remove libafs-perl from testing.  Bug#621999 will require
substantial work in the openafs package to resolve (building completely
different versions of the client libraries than what upstream currently
builds), and this should not hold up the Perl transition.

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-686-bigmem (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 17:03:40 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> 
> Please remove libafs-perl from testing.  Bug#621999 will require
> substantial work in the openafs package to resolve (building completely
> different versions of the client libraries than what upstream currently
> builds), and this should not hold up the Perl transition.
> 
Removed as part of the perl transition.

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---

Reply to: