Bug#624768: RM: libnss-db/2.2.3pre1-3.1
retitle 624768 RFH: libnss-db
reassign 624768 wnpp
thank you
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 22:58, Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2011, Ondrej Surý wrote:
>
>> Well, libnss-ldap(d) + NSCD could do the trick for short offline
>> periods (with HA LDAP setup).
>>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/LDAP/NSS
>
> I don't think libpam-ldap would meet our requirements. And nscd is best
> avoided.
Then somebody should step-up and give a libnss-db little love. It's
shame we couldn't push it to GSoC now :(. Unfortunately it's so far
away from DNS as it could be, so I am probably not be able to adopt it
in our labs and I have already too many tasks on my shoulder. So I
cannot really promise anything, but if I catch some spare cycles
somewhere and nothing happens here, I'll at least fix the security
issue and libdb transition in a NMU. However I still think that from a
long term this needs to be
Reassigning to wnpp as a RFH and Ccing 604854 (which is about building
libnss-db from eglibc).
O.
--
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
http://blog.rfc1925.org/
Reply to: