Hello (again):
El Lunes, 25 de Abril de 2011, Raúl Sánchez Siles escribió:
> Hello:
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:58:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 19:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:13 +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
> > > > We assume that you agree or at least you will consider translation
> > > > changes.
> > >
> > > Assuming they're updated translations and apply to whatever set of
> > > changes we end up finally considering, we'll certainly look at them.
> > > We tend not to add new translations but from the debdiff they all look
> > > like updates (fwiw, historically we've not really accepted updated
> > > translations either).
> > >
> > > > Our plan is to work out a new diff that excludes these changes,
> > > > we'll let you know
> > > >
> > > > as soon as we have it ready for review. It's probably expected before
> > > > next week.
> > >
> > > Thanks, and for caring about fixing kvirc in Debian stable.
> >
> > Is there an updated ETA for that new diff?
>
> Thanks for your interest in this issue. I apologize for the longish
> delay. It's certainly not being an easy task, but I'm working on it. I'll
> need some more time, my previous estimate was obviously very optimistic.
> My figures now are at least a week more for a "neat/tidy" diff and then
> one more week for testing.
>
> I'm not intending to tightly engage this schedule since I'm having some
> real life overhead, but I'll try harder this time. Thanks for the
> patience.
>
> Regards,
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Adam
Not strictly Monday (here) but at least I have a diff, available at [0]. I
tried to remove all unnecessary changes from the former big diff. There are
still some minor changes that could be added, but I preferred to go for the
simplest version in order to have an assessment about the feasibility of this
kind of patch. If you deem this, or something very similar, can be accepted
I'll go on with the testing which shouldn't be very different to what we are
testing right now.
To be honest skimming the patch took quite a while (as you may have already
noticed) and sure this is not a reason to accept it. What I'm trying to say is
that I don't mind spending some more time on this and have it in shape for a
Stable release which was our aim from the beginning.
[0] http://trismegisto.no-ip.org/incoming/kvirc_4.0.2-4.0.4_b.debdiff.lzma
Regards,
--
Raúl Sánchez Siles
----->Proud Debian user<-----
Linux registered user #416098
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.