[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition



On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 15:40:56 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> If I disregard 2) above, this adds:
> - claws-mail-extra-plugins (hint added, should migrate to testing tonight)
> - genders (should migrate tonight)
> - inn2 (RC bugs affecting alpha/hppa packages in sid, should be forced
>   into testing)
> - libdevel-cover-perl (9 days / 10)
> - libscalar-string-perl (9 days / 10)

Migrated.

> - elinks (2 days / 5)
> - highlight (5 days / 10)
> - libb-hooks-op-annotation-perl (3 days / 10, depends on
>   libextutils-depends-perl, 6 days / 10)
> - libb-hooks-op-check-perl (6 days / 10)
> - libconvert-binary-c-perl (5 days / 10)
> - libdata-alias-perl (1 day / 10)
> - libdatetime-perl (3 days / 10)
> - libdbd-mysql-perl (1 day / 10)
> - libdevel-declare-perl (5 days / 10)
> - libdevel-refcount-perl (3 days / 10)
> - libdevel-size-perl (7 days / 10)
> - libmoose-perl (5 days / 10, depends on libeval-closure-perl, 1 day /
>   10)
> - libparams-validate-perl (8 days / 10)
> - libtext-levenshteinxs-perl (0 days / 10)
> - libtrue-perl (6 days / 10, depends on libb-hooks-op-check-perl)
> - libxml-sax-expatxs-perl (7 days / 10)
> - openscap (2 days / 10)
> - xchat-gnome (3 days / 10)

I reduced the aging to 5 days for these, so they should be able to
migrate ahead of perl 5.12 if they don't get RC bugs in the mean time.

> - kvirc (blocked by libcrypto++)

This will hopefully be sorted over the week end.

> - apparmor (only in sid)
> - gbrowse (only in sid)
> - gpib (RC buggy, only in sid)
> - hyperestraier (FTBFS on mips)
> - libgimp-perl (only in sid, RC buggy)
> - libqt-perl (only in sid, RC buggy)
> - libsys-syslog-perl (only in sid, RC buggy)
> - opendchub (only in sid, RC buggy)

Shouldn't be an issue.

> - lasso (gcj ICE on kfreebsd-amd64)
> - openbabel (6 days / 10, SONAME bump, FTBFS)
> - rxvt-unicode (RC buggy, depends on ncurses)
> - slurm-llnl (RC buggy)
> - zbar (FTBFS on ia64)
> - znc (FTBFS)
> 
These are the problematic ones so far, besides possible FTBFS in the
rest of the 400 packages.

Cheers,
Julien



Reply to: