[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#622729: marked as done (nmu: libgdal-grass_1.7.3-2)



Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:25:05 +0200
with message-id <4DA6F5B1.9080407@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#622729: nmu: libgdal-grass_1.7.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #622729,
regarding nmu: libgdal-grass_1.7.3-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
622729: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622729
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu libgdal-grass_1.7.3-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against current grass package"
dw grass_6.4.1-1 . ALL . -m "grass-dev (>= 6.4.1-1~)"

Qgis is still broken and needs updating, so ignore it.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 14/04/2011 10:55, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:

nmu libgdal-grass_1.7.3-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against current grass
package"

done.

dw grass_6.4.1-1 . ALL . -m "grass-dev (>= 6.4.1-1~)"


This is incorrect (because grass-dev is part of the source package grass)
and not needed (since grass 6.4.1-1 is already available on all
architectures).

Regards,

--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: