[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#619191: marked as done (nmu: nettle transition)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:35:16 +0200
with message-id <20110404113516.GA15260@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#619191: nmu: nettle transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #619191,
regarding nmu: nettle transition
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
619191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal

A recent new version of nettle was recently updated, introducing some API
and ABI changes. nettle doesn't have many rdepends, but these exist (and
require no source changes):

nmu chiark-utils_4.1.28+nmu2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against nettle 2.1 (libnettle4)"
nmu chiark-tcl_1.1.0+nmu2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against nettle 2.1 (libnettle4)"
nmu rdup_1.0.5-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against nettle 2.1 (libnettle4)"

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren@debian.org
Debian Developer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 22:51:56 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:

> A recent new version of nettle was recently updated, introducing some API
> and ABI changes. nettle doesn't have many rdepends, but these exist (and
> require no source changes):
> 
All done:

    nettle |      2.1-2 |       testing | source

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---
Reply to: