Hi Adam, On 6 March 2011 00:18, Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > - Testing and unstable have tesseract 2.04-2.1, so the package for > stable would need to have a lower version than that. I'd suggest 2.04-2 > +squeeze1, which is conventional. Sure. This will be my first contribution directly to stable or oldstable, as I am sure you can tell. I've updated the oldstable package to also conform. There was no mention of the convention in the Developers' Reference[1]. Is this worth a bug report? > - It would be nice if the reasoning for the quilt build-dep bump was > mentioned. My suspicion is that this is due to the use of "dh > --with-quilt" triggering a lintian warning but this isn't really > necessary for stable as the relevant quilt version is already included > there (and the warning has thus been dropped by the version of lintian > in experimental). I've dropped it, assuming you are correct, and asked Jakub Wilk, who prepared the original NMU, to confirm. >> Would you like separate bugs to be opened for each distribution? At >> the moment, the same sid/wheezy bug is quoted/closed. > > That's fine (and the right way to do it). Sorry, but your answer is ambigious. Would you like the extra two bugs opened (and closed)? I would also suggest that the Developers' Reference could be improved to confirm this, one way or the other. Regards Jeff [1]http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable
Attachment:
tesseract_2.03-2+lenny1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
tesseract_2.04-2+squeeze1.debdiff
Description: Binary data