Hi Adam, On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:15:44PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 04:48 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 01:39:39PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Have any of the reverse-dependencies been test-built against the new > > > version? Does the move to 5.0.1 imply any source changes being required > > > for reverse-dependencies, or "just" rebuilds? (I say "just" as there > > > appear to be around 350 r-dependencies, including at least five from the > > > GCC suite). > > > > I haven't done any test-builds. Since the -dev package changed name, > > I presume that "just rebuild" won't work; rather, the sources have > > to edit their build-deps. > > Out of interest, why is the -dev package versioned? Thinking about this more, I can't think of any reason for it to be versioned. Especially since two GMP versions cannot coexist in the archive. So I think I'll upload with simply libgmp-dev. Are you ready for the new upload? Thanks, -Steve
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature