Re: [SRM] Approval for xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.13.0-6
On Fri, February 18, 2011 13:16, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> | xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.13.0-6) stable; urgency=low
> |
> | * Cherry-pick from upstream:
> | - uxa: Fallback if the temporary is too large
> | * This fixes a null pointer dereference with some rendering operations
> | involving large pictures (Closes: #613830). Thanks, Enrico!
> | * Cherry-pick from upstream, thanks to Bjørn Mork:
> | - Don't replace the scanout bo through PutImage
> | - dri: Fix the use of the uninitialised bo for flink
> | * These should fix issues with SDL (Closes: #602207).
> |
> | -- Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:03:12 +0100
>
> The first fix is quite trivial and also applied to current master
> until yesterday, it was cherry-picked for unstable as well.
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-intel.git;a=commitdiff;h=7d59555f72d059b75dde91db8047e6195d0d334a
That looks fine; thanks.
> The second fix is (user-contributed) backports:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-intel.git;a=commitdiff;h=91af3c5ead6157ed065ccd3e3cc413c945182488
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-intel.git;a=commitdiff;h=bdca7df8d4238f0630aeda75ed02461d76a5ea05
That would be far easier to read if the variables hadn't all been renamed
in the process. :-/
> I've reproduced both issues on my laptop, verified the fixes worked
> fine, and I haven't noticed any regression.
Were your tests against unstable, or squeeze + your proposed fixes?
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: