[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#611117: marked as done (unblock: apt/0.8.10.3)



Your message dated Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:30:30 +0000
with message-id <1296415830.25651.9007.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#611117: unblock: apt/0.8.10.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #611117,
regarding unblock: apt/0.8.10.3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
611117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal

Please unblock package apt

The 0.8.10.2 upload fixes a potential endless loop in apt-ftparchive
The 0.8.10.3 upload fixes a encoding issue with es.po and updates
it to the latest version. Both changes are smal and important for
a high quality release. Please consider them.

Thanks,
 michael

unblock apt/0.8.10.3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'),
  (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 19:58 +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 18:30, Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 18:41 +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
> >> Please unblock package apt
[...]
> >> The 0.8.10.3 upload fixes a encoding issue with es.po and updates
> >> it to the latest version. Both changes are smal and important for
> >> a high quality release. Please consider them.
> >
> > Translation changes haven't been considered on their own for a little
> > while now.
> 
> es (and sl) are primary updated not for new translation strings but
> because the encoding of these files were bad, so that all strings
> including non-ascii chars were garbled (much like the issue with
> mutt and debconf translations).

After a certain amount of arguing with myself, I've decided to unblock
this - not for the code changes but for the Spanish translation fix, as
exposing new users to the broken-encoding version wouldn't be great.

Regards,

Adam



--- End Message ---

Reply to: